A touch imperfect?You do not always know whom youre going to annoy.But if youre going to irritate a consumer, its probably ill-advised to irritate somebody whos won the George Polk Award for legal reporting.
more Technically Incorrect
AT&T accepted that Marshalls partner had actually returned the iPhone. And now, on Twitter.When it comes to consumer stories, AT&T might not even be the worst transgressor.” Some even declared AT&T had actually behaved this method for more than a decade.
An AT&T representative told me: “We said sorry to Mr. Marshall for the aggravation this miscommunication provided a credit and caused for the returned phone. What depths of (lack of) supervision led to AT&Ts own proof being disregarded by, oh, AT&T? You also question about all the individuals who do not have Marshalls online platform or even do not recognize for a long time that theyre being, um, mischarged.Somehow, Im reminded of a line from one of AT&Ts newest advertisements: “Its not made complex.”
Yet here we are with AT&T twiddling its thumbs over here and Josh Marshall, the well known journalist behind– and atop– Talking Points Memo over there, tweeting urgently with, one imagines, several fingers and perhaps a minor snarl. What, you might wonder, has AT&T done? (This time.) Well, heres how Marshall began his tale on Twitter: “Oh cool, @ATT charging me a second time for the exact same iPhone. I dont know how this whole company does not get shut down for scams. Their whole organization design seems based on incorrect charge card charges and using people down with phone trees and bad customer service.” Hours and hours To Say The Phones Not Ours.That sounds a touch remarkable, you may muse. Then evaluate it versus the details. Marshall stated his wife had returned an iPhone she bought to AT&T. Somehow, the company acted as if she had not.
Last Tuesday, he said of his partner: “She invested days on the phone with them, getting promised she would not be billed. Just to have them try to do it once again a month later. Cant highlight enough, numerous days in which she invested literally 4 or 5 hours on the phone throughout a day. Idea this was solved after we provided them proof for like the 9th time. Then this afternoon I get an email (not sure why to me, though were on the exact same overall account) saying were charged again.” Of course, AT&T interrupted Marshalls tweeting with a worried Twittered message to please DM the company immediately. He said he did just that and the company didnt immediately react. Which has its own level of metapoetry.These are the bare essentials. Yet Marshall presented proof, which he said AT&T had actually demanded. It was, he discussed, a transcript of his other halfs conversation with, oh, AT&T.
3/ demanded evidence/confirmation etc that she had actually proven the phone had actually been returned and so on. Heres the records of that interaction. pic.twitter.com/MsJEaJuaqO— Josh Marshall (@joshtpm) March 16, 2021
Marshall said his better half had actually returned an iPhone she purchased to AT&T.” Of course, AT&T disrupted Marshalls tweeting with a worried Twittered message to please DM the company immediately. Marshall presented evidence, which he stated AT&T had required. An AT&T spokesperson told me: “We said sorry to Mr. Marshall for the disappointment this miscommunication provided a credit and caused for the returned phone. What depths of (lack of) guidance led to AT&Ts own evidence being ignored by, oh, AT&T?